Jan 26 2014

King Arthur was actually Arthur Mac Aedan, the sixth-century son of an ancient King of Scotland

Arthur's Excalibur

Arthur’s Excalibur

Pic: TSPL, The Scotsman

Author Adam Ardrey claims that instead of the romantic English king of legend who lived at Camelot – which is often said to be Tintagel in Cornwall or in Wales – Arthur was actually Arthur Mac Aedan, the sixth-century son of an ancient King of Scotland, whose Camelot was a marsh in Argyll. He claims that King Arthur was a Scottish, pre-Christian warlord whose remains are buried on Iona, according to the Scots historian’s new book.

He also suggests that Arthur pulled the sword Excalibur from a stone at Dunadd near Kilmartin, died near Falkirk and was buried on the Hebridean island of Iona, which he declares to be Avalon. Ardrey, an amateur historian who works as an advocate in Edinburgh and previously wrote a book claiming Merlin the wizard was actually a politician who lived in the Partick area of Glasgow, spent years investigating his theories and says that they can be proved “beyond reasonable doubt”. The assertions in his book Finding Arthur: The True Origins Of The Once And Future King are strengthened by the discovery in 2011 of what some experts believe is King Arthur’s round table in the grounds of Stirling Castle. Ardrey says he not only believes Arthur is buried in Iona but would love to see the site excavated to look for proof. He says:

The legendary Arthur is said to be buried in an island in the western seas – Avalon – but in the south of Britain there are no islands in the western seas. Iona fits all the criteria. It’s an island where hundreds of kings were buried. Some say 128. Other members of Arthur Mac Aedan’s family were buried there too. I say Arthur was also buried there.

Ardrey states that Camelot is a nondescript marshy area north of Dunadd, an ancient hill fort in ­Argyll, where the sword in the stone “scene” was enacted.

He said that he also believes Arthur’s 12 battles were fought on different sites across Scotland, including Stow in the Borders, where he says the Battle of Guinnion took place, and the Battle of the City of the Legions, which he says was fought on the site of the Roman fort of Trimontium in Melrose. He said:

The litmus test for Arthur is the 12 battles and the battle list. I was able to identify all of them geographically, as well as historically place them in context. Six of them are even in a straight line. Everything fits into context.

Trimontium, site of Roman Fort

Trimontium, site of Roman Fort

Pic: TSPL, The Scotsman

Many historians have attempted to link Arthur with Cornwall and Tintagel Castle, and in 1998 an ancient stone bearing a sixth-century inscription similar to the name Arthur was unearthed at the castle, the mythical birthplace of the legendary king. It was hoped that the discovery could prove that King Arthur had his headquarters at the site of the ruined castle on the north coast of Cornwall, but the findings – of a piece of slate inscribed with the name Artognov – Latin for the English name Arthnou – remained inconclusive. However, in 2011 it was believed that Arthur’s Round ­Table may have been ­unearthed by Glasgow University archaeologists investigating the King’s Knot in the grounds of Stirling Castle. The book also asserts that Arthur became the victim of an establishment conspiracy which was determined to recast him as an English Christian hero. It also claims that, as a Scottish man of the druidic “Old Way”, he was the last of his kind holding out against a zealous Christian onslaught. Ardrey said:

I am hoping the book provokes debate and discussion. But if I’m right, then 100 years of British history needs to be rewritten.

Read the full story at The Scotsman website.

———————————

You can also now download a Celtic Myth Podshow App from the iTunes store. This is the most convenient and reliable way to access the Celtic Myth Podshow on your iPhone or iPod Touch. You’re always connected to the latest episode, and our App users have access to exclusive bonus content, just touch and play! To find out more visit the iTunes Store or our Description Page.

 

iphone

You can now also find an Android version of the App which works identically to the iPhone version. You can find it on Handster at http://www.handster.com/celtic_myth.html or by using the QR code opposite. It’s also found on the Opera Marketplace in the US.

You can now also find the Windows 8 Phone App in the Windows 8 Phone Store.

Windows 8 Phone App

If you come to the site and listen or listen from one of our players – have you considered subscribing? It’s easy and you automatically get the episodes on your computer when they come out. If you’re unsure about the whole RSS/Subscribing thing take a look at our Help page.

2 responses so far

2 Responses to “King Arthur was actually Arthur Mac Aedan, the sixth-century son of an ancient King of Scotland”

  1. John Willmotton 26 Jan 2014 at 8:45 am

    I have heard and read many versions of this story, especially when I worked on Iona. There there is the movie with Clive Owen as Arthur that touches on this.

    The first thing I think of is that there is not one exclusive Arthur, or Artur, which seems to be in all European languages and beyond during Roman times. In Ireland he is Airt or Art.

    I am biased and like the Scottish Arthur stories, such as this, even though they may not seem as colourful as the Glastonbury, Cornwall, Welsh and Irish stories around where I live.

    I think the important thing is not to let Arthur become like a super hero like Superman or a Messiah that is to appear and solve our lives woes for us.

    There is much in all Arthur stories to fill us with wonder, motivate us, and bring clarity to our values, morality and honour.

    Good to have books like this come out from time to time to remind us that stories we hear may not have originated from a singular person.

  2. Garyon 26 Jan 2014 at 3:08 pm

    Hi Jiohn,

    Some good thoughts there, thank you! :)

    Gary xxx

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Bookmark and Share
All content on this site is believed to be either in the public domain or is presented as an introduction to the originating site. No infringement of copyright is intended. If an infringement has unwittingly occurred, please inform us straightway by email and it will be removed.